HB 3171 Example Letter

I am writing in support of H.B. 3171 by Representative Pitts.    Superintendents across the state, as well as many educational organizations, are in strong support of streamlining the compliance monitoring system that is less intrusive and focuses on federal funded programs. 

The DEC system that is presently in place included a review of 16 programs with 140 indicators and 724 probes.  Preparing for these visits has proven to be a tremendous burden to districts in terms of financial costs and employee time.  The visits are very stressful and disruptive for the district.  The requirements are a moving target, changing frequently.  Most of the DEC requirements are not legally required because they address state programs, rather than focusing on federal programs.  It requires massive amounts of paperwork to document each of the probes.  Many aspects of the DEC process are duplicated through PEIMS submissions and independent audits.  This process has forced district and campus improvement plans to become compliance, budget and financial records rather than planning documents for student improvement.  Last but not least, 100% compliance with all indicators and probes is required for each of the programs in order to obtain “compliance”!

On behalf of those superintendents that have experienced this intrusive process and those that are scheduled to endure the process in the future, we are extremely appreciative of Representative Pitts’ acknowledgement of our plight and his willingness to address our concern.

Respectfully yours,
Mary Ann Whiteker
Superintendent
TAMS President